Ethiopia PDR vs Peru: Cattle — Manure applied to soils

Ethiopia PDR
36.67 million kg
in 1992
Peru
34.47 million kg
in 2023
Ethiopia PDR rank
61st
Peru rank
63rd

Cattle — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Ethiopia PDR
  • Peru
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M196119922023

How they compare

Ethiopia PDR currently reports 36.67 million kg against 34.47 million kg in Peru, a difference of 2.20 million kg.

That makes Ethiopia PDR's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Ethiopia PDR has been ahead every year.

Ethiopia PDR ranks 61st and Peru ranks 63rd of 206 countries.

Ethiopia PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia PDR Peru Difference Ahead
1960s 27.71 million kg 20.05 million kg 7.66 million kg Ethiopia PDR
1970s 29.96 million kg 23.62 million kg 6.34 million kg Ethiopia PDR
1980s 32.22 million kg 23.23 million kg 9.00 million kg Ethiopia PDR
1990s 35.95 million kg 21.18 million kg 14.78 million kg Ethiopia PDR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure applied to soils, Ethiopia PDR or Peru?
Ethiopia PDR, at 36.67 million kg against 34.47 million kg in Peru as of 1992.
What is the difference in cattle — manure applied to soils between Ethiopia PDR and Peru?
2.20 million kg, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Peru?
32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
How do Ethiopia PDR and Peru rank globally for cattle — manure applied to soils?
Ethiopia PDR ranks 61st and Peru ranks 63rd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia PDR vs Peru: Cattle — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/ethiopia-pdr/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/ethiopia-pdr/peru/">Ethiopia PDR vs Peru: Cattle — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).