Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Cattle — Manure applied to soils (N content)

Middle Africa
46.69 million kg
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
65.44 million kg
in 2023
Middle Africa rank
7th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
5th

Cattle — Manure applied to soils (N content) over time

  • Middle Africa
  • United Republic of Tanzania
020.0M40.0M60.0M196119922023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 65.44 million kg against 46.69 million kg in Middle Africa, a difference of 18.75 million kg.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 1.4 times Middle Africa's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, United Republic of Tanzania has been ahead every year.

Middle Africa ranks 7th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 5th of 20 groups.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Middle Africa United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 9.48 million kg 13.59 million kg 4.11 million kg United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 11.15 million kg 16.56 million kg 5.41 million kg United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 15.18 million kg 20.34 million kg 5.16 million kg United Republic of Tanzania
1990s 19.17 million kg 23.85 million kg 4.69 million kg United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 25.57 million kg 35.16 million kg 9.59 million kg United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 34.82 million kg 48.14 million kg 13.32 million kg United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 44.15 million kg 62.16 million kg 18.01 million kg United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure applied to soils, Middle Africa or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 65.44 million kg against 46.69 million kg in Middle Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — manure applied to soils between Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania?
18.75 million kg, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for cattle — manure applied to soils?
Middle Africa ranks 7th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 5th of 20 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Cattle — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/middle-africa/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/middle-africa/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Cattle — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).