Puerto Rico vs Rwanda: Cattle — Manure applied to soils

Puerto Rico
2.14 million kg
in 2023
Rwanda
2.54 million kg
in 2023
Puerto Rico rank
134th
Rwanda rank
132nd

Cattle — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Puerto Rico
  • Rwanda
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 2.54 million kg against 2.14 million kg in Puerto Rico, a difference of 398,990 kg.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Puerto Rico's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Puerto Rico ranks 134th and Rwanda ranks 132nd of 206 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Puerto Rico averaged higher in 6 and Rwanda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Puerto Rico Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 6.24 million kg 653,479 kg 5.58 million kg Puerto Rico
1970s 6.75 million kg 847,505 kg 5.90 million kg Puerto Rico
1980s 5.06 million kg 1.02 million kg 4.04 million kg Puerto Rico
1990s 3.33 million kg 1.12 million kg 2.21 million kg Puerto Rico
2000s 3.21 million kg 1.81 million kg 1.40 million kg Puerto Rico
2010s 2.47 million kg 2.19 million kg 273,359 kg Puerto Rico
2020s 2.22 million kg 2.62 million kg 401,785 kg Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure applied to soils, Puerto Rico or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 2.54 million kg against 2.14 million kg in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — manure applied to soils between Puerto Rico and Rwanda?
398,990 kg, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Puerto Rico and Rwanda rank globally for cattle — manure applied to soils?
Puerto Rico ranks 134th and Rwanda ranks 132nd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Puerto Rico vs Rwanda: Cattle — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/puerto-rico-us/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/puerto-rico-us/rwanda/">Puerto Rico vs Rwanda: Cattle — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).