Mozambique vs Saudi Arabia: Cattle: Manure applied to soils … applied square kilometre leaches

Mozambique
0.5909 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Saudi Arabia
0.2123 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique rank
158th
Saudi Arabia rank
160th

Cattle: Manure applied to soils … applied square kilometre leaches over time

  • Mozambique
  • Saudi Arabia
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 0.5909 kg per square kilometre against 0.2123 kg per square kilometre in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.3786 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Mozambique's figure about 2.8 times Saudi Arabia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Mozambique has been ahead every year.

Mozambique ranks 158th and Saudi Arabia ranks 160th of 167 countries.

Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.7732 kg per square kilometre 0.0418 kg per square kilometre 0.7314 kg per square kilometre Mozambique
1970s 0.9585 kg per square kilometre 0.089 kg per square kilometre 0.8695 kg per square kilometre Mozambique
1980s 0.9291 kg per square kilometre 0.0914 kg per square kilometre 0.8377 kg per square kilometre Mozambique
1990s 0.287 kg per square kilometre 0.0801 kg per square kilometre 0.2069 kg per square kilometre Mozambique
2000s 0.262 kg per square kilometre 0.1177 kg per square kilometre 0.1443 kg per square kilometre Mozambique
2010s 0.434 kg per square kilometre 0.1422 kg per square kilometre 0.2919 kg per square kilometre Mozambique
2020s 0.5597 kg per square kilometre 0.2255 kg per square kilometre 0.3341 kg per square kilometre Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure applied to soils that leaches (n content), per square, Mozambique or Saudi Arabia?
Mozambique, at 0.5909 kg per square kilometre against 0.2123 kg per square kilometre in Saudi Arabia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — manure applied to soils that leaches (n content), per square between Mozambique and Saudi Arabia?
0.3786 kg per square kilometre, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Saudi Arabia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mozambique and Saudi Arabia rank globally for cattle — manure applied to soils that leaches (n content), per square?
Mozambique ranks 158th and Saudi Arabia ranks 160th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs Saudi Arabia: Cattle — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-applied-to-soils-that-leaches-n-content-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-applied-to-soils-that-leaches-n-content-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/saudi-arabia/">Mozambique vs Saudi Arabia: Cattle — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.