Australia and New Zealand vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Cattle: Manure applied to soils … volatilises annual growth rate
Cattle: Manure applied to soils … volatilises annual growth rate over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Sub-Saharan Africa
How they compare
Australia and New Zealand currently reports 12.19 % change on previous year against 2.91 % change on previous year in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 9.28 % change on previous year.
That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 4.2 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.
The two have swapped places 22 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 7th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 4th of 209 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Sub-Saharan Africa in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Sub-Saharan Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.96 % change on previous year | 2.16 % change on previous year | 0.1993 % change on previous year | Sub-Saharan Africa |
| 1970s | 1.19 % change on previous year | 1.51 % change on previous year | 0.3237 % change on previous year | Sub-Saharan Africa |
| 1980s | -1.05 % change on previous year | 1.42 % change on previous year | 2.47 % change on previous year | Sub-Saharan Africa |
| 1990s | 1.82 % change on previous year | 1.58 % change on previous year | 0.2326 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2000s | 0.788 % change on previous year | 3.68 % change on previous year | 2.9 % change on previous year | Sub-Saharan Africa |
| 2010s | -0.6058 % change on previous year | 2.54 % change on previous year | 3.15 % change on previous year | Sub-Saharan Africa |
| 2020s | 2.4 % change on previous year | 1.9 % change on previous year | 0.4938 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cattle — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content), annual, Australia and New Zealand or Sub-Saharan Africa?
- Australia and New Zealand, at 12.19 % change on previous year against 2.91 % change on previous year in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in cattle — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content), annual between Australia and New Zealand and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 9.28 % change on previous year, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for cattle — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content), annual?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 7th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 4th of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.