How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Uruguay?

18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Serbia vs Uruguay: Cattle: Manure applied to soils … unit GDP volatilises

Serbia

0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Uruguay

0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Serbia rank

40th

Uruguay rank

39th

Cattle: Manure applied to soils … unit GDP volatilises over time

Serbia
Uruguay

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP in Serbia, a difference of 0 kg per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Uruguay ahead.

Serbia ranks 40th and Uruguay ranks 39th of 166 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Serbia	Uruguay	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Uruguay
2010s	0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Serbia
2020s	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content), per, Serbia or Uruguay?: Uruguay, at 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP in Serbia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content), per between Serbia and Uruguay?: 0 kg per US$ of GDP, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Uruguay?: 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Serbia and Uruguay rank globally for cattle — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content), per?: Serbia ranks 40th and Uruguay ranks 39th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Serbia vs Uruguay: Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/serbia/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/serbia/uruguay/">Serbia vs Uruguay: Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per unit of GDP
Unit: kg per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 168 places, 9,040 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 04 October 2026

Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.