Estonia vs Zimbabwe: Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Estonia
1.73 million kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1.67 million kg
in 2023
Estonia rank
97th
Zimbabwe rank
98th

Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Estonia
  • Zimbabwe
1.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M5.0M196119922023

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 1.73 million kg against 1.67 million kg in Zimbabwe, a difference of 65,410 kg.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.

Estonia ranks 97th and Zimbabwe ranks 98th of 188 countries.

Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 3.48 million kg 1.56 million kg 1.92 million kg Estonia
2000s 1.98 million kg 1.57 million kg 408,677 kg Estonia
2010s 1.82 million kg 1.58 million kg 244,311 kg Estonia
2020s 1.78 million kg 1.60 million kg 176,250 kg Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Estonia or Zimbabwe?
Estonia, at 1.73 million kg against 1.67 million kg in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Estonia and Zimbabwe?
65,410 kg, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Zimbabwe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Estonia and Zimbabwe rank globally for cattle — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Estonia ranks 97th and Zimbabwe ranks 98th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs Zimbabwe: Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/estonia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/estonia/zimbabwe/">Estonia vs Zimbabwe: Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).