Iceland vs Mauritania: Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Iceland
574,676 kg
in 2023
Mauritania
638,254 kg
in 2023
Iceland rank
121st
Mauritania rank
119th

Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Iceland
  • Mauritania
0200.0k400.0k600.0k196119922023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 638,254 kg against 574,676 kg in Iceland, a difference of 63,578 kg.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 121st and Mauritania ranks 119th of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 4 and Mauritania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 513,410 kg 524,241 kg 10,831 kg Mauritania
1970s 525,274 kg 367,808 kg 157,466 kg Iceland
1980s 541,642 kg 380,050 kg 161,592 kg Iceland
1990s 562,037 kg 435,926 kg 126,112 kg Iceland
2000s 506,680 kg 506,004 kg 676 kg Iceland
2010s 545,916 kg 584,894 kg 38,978 kg Mauritania
2020s 567,466 kg 638,428 kg 70,962 kg Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Iceland or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at 638,254 kg against 574,676 kg in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Iceland and Mauritania?
63,578 kg, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Mauritania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Mauritania rank globally for cattle — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Iceland ranks 121st and Mauritania ranks 119th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Mauritania: Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/iceland/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/iceland/mauritania/">Iceland vs Mauritania: Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).