Mauritania vs Rwanda: Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Mauritania
638,254 kg
in 2023
Rwanda
508,454 kg
in 2023
Mauritania rank
119th
Rwanda rank
122nd

Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Mauritania
  • Rwanda
200.0k400.0k600.0k196119922023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 638,254 kg against 508,454 kg in Rwanda, a difference of 129,800 kg.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.3 times Rwanda's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.

Mauritania ranks 119th and Rwanda ranks 122nd of 190 countries.

Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 524,241 kg 130,696 kg 393,545 kg Mauritania
1970s 367,808 kg 169,501 kg 198,307 kg Mauritania
1980s 380,050 kg 204,317 kg 175,733 kg Mauritania
1990s 435,926 kg 224,231 kg 211,694 kg Mauritania
2000s 506,004 kg 362,366 kg 143,638 kg Mauritania
2010s 584,894 kg 438,453 kg 146,441 kg Mauritania
2020s 638,428 kg 524,236 kg 114,192 kg Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Mauritania or Rwanda?
Mauritania, at 638,254 kg against 508,454 kg in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Mauritania and Rwanda?
129,800 kg, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritania and Rwanda rank globally for cattle — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Mauritania ranks 119th and Rwanda ranks 122nd of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Rwanda: Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/mauritania/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/mauritania/rwanda/">Mauritania vs Rwanda: Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).