Papua New Guinea vs Trinidad and Tobago: Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Papua New Guinea
61,420 kg
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
52,279 kg
in 2023
Papua New Guinea rank
147th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
149th

Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Trinidad and Tobago
25.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k196119922023

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 61,420 kg against 52,279 kg in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 9,141 kg.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 147th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 149th of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 4 and Trinidad and Tobago in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 31,114 kg 29,218 kg 1,896 kg Papua New Guinea
1970s 78,264 kg 35,857 kg 42,407 kg Papua New Guinea
1980s 76,938 kg 56,897 kg 20,041 kg Papua New Guinea
1990s 61,192 kg 102,417 kg 41,225 kg Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 61,040 kg 100,812 kg 39,772 kg Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 62,303 kg 62,478 kg 175.2 kg Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 61,555 kg 52,241 kg 9,314 kg Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Papua New Guinea or Trinidad and Tobago?
Papua New Guinea, at 61,420 kg against 52,279 kg in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Papua New Guinea and Trinidad and Tobago?
9,141 kg, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Papua New Guinea and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for cattle — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Papua New Guinea ranks 147th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 149th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Trinidad and Tobago: Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/papua-new-guinea/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/papua-new-guinea/trinidad-and-tobago/">Papua New Guinea vs Trinidad and Tobago: Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).