Puerto Rico vs Rwanda: Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Puerto Rico
428,657 kg
in 2023
Rwanda
508,454 kg
in 2023
Puerto Rico rank
124th
Rwanda rank
122nd

Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Puerto Rico
  • Rwanda
0500.0k1.0M1.5M196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 508,454 kg against 428,657 kg in Puerto Rico, a difference of 79,797 kg.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Puerto Rico's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Puerto Rico ranks 124th and Rwanda ranks 122nd of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Puerto Rico averaged higher in 6 and Rwanda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Puerto Rico Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 1.25 million kg 130,696 kg 1.12 million kg Puerto Rico
1970s 1.35 million kg 169,501 kg 1.18 million kg Puerto Rico
1980s 1.01 million kg 204,317 kg 808,297 kg Puerto Rico
1990s 666,347 kg 224,231 kg 442,116 kg Puerto Rico
2000s 642,006 kg 362,366 kg 279,640 kg Puerto Rico
2010s 493,125 kg 438,453 kg 54,672 kg Puerto Rico
2020s 443,879 kg 524,236 kg 80,356 kg Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Puerto Rico or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 508,454 kg against 428,657 kg in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Puerto Rico and Rwanda?
79,797 kg, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Puerto Rico and Rwanda rank globally for cattle — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Puerto Rico ranks 124th and Rwanda ranks 122nd of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Puerto Rico vs Rwanda: Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/puerto-rico-us/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/puerto-rico-us/rwanda/">Puerto Rico vs Rwanda: Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).