Rwanda vs Tunisia: Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Rwanda
508,454 kg
in 2023
Tunisia
452,397 kg
in 2023
Rwanda rank
122nd
Tunisia rank
123rd

Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Rwanda
  • Tunisia
200.0k400.0k600.0k196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 508,454 kg against 452,397 kg in Tunisia, a difference of 56,057 kg.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tunisia ahead.

Rwanda ranks 122nd and Tunisia ranks 123rd of 188 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 130,696 kg 223,132 kg 92,436 kg Tunisia
1970s 169,501 kg 357,325 kg 187,824 kg Tunisia
1980s 204,317 kg 305,292 kg 100,975 kg Tunisia
1990s 224,231 kg 441,850 kg 217,619 kg Tunisia
2000s 362,366 kg 601,668 kg 239,302 kg Tunisia
2010s 438,453 kg 518,207 kg 79,754 kg Tunisia
2020s 524,236 kg 457,562 kg 66,674 kg Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Rwanda or Tunisia?
Rwanda, at 508,454 kg against 452,397 kg in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Rwanda and Tunisia?
56,057 kg, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Tunisia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Tunisia rank globally for cattle — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Rwanda ranks 122nd and Tunisia ranks 123rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Tunisia: Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/rwanda/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/rwanda/tunisia/">Rwanda vs Tunisia: Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).