Bhutan vs Sao Tome and Principe: Cattle — Manure left on pasture (N content), per square kilometre

Bhutan
65.21 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
64.59 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
140th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
141st

Cattle — Manure left on pasture (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Bhutan
  • Sao Tome and Principe
50100150200196119922023

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 65.21 kg per square kilometre against 64.59 kg per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.62 kg per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Bhutan ranks 140th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 141st of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 2 and Sao Tome and Principe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 56.86 kg per square kilometre 148.54 kg per square kilometre 91.68 kg per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1970s 71.78 kg per square kilometre 109.82 kg per square kilometre 38.04 kg per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 92.51 kg per square kilometre 136.9 kg per square kilometre 44.39 kg per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 74.39 kg per square kilometre 161.5 kg per square kilometre 87.1 kg per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 70.49 kg per square kilometre 137.33 kg per square kilometre 66.84 kg per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 78.16 kg per square kilometre 54.74 kg per square kilometre 23.43 kg per square kilometre Bhutan
2020s 76.84 kg per square kilometre 63.57 kg per square kilometre 13.27 kg per square kilometre Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure left on pasture (n content), per square kilometre, Bhutan or Sao Tome and Principe?
Bhutan, at 65.21 kg per square kilometre against 64.59 kg per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — manure left on pasture (n content), per square kilometre between Bhutan and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.62 kg per square kilometre, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for cattle — manure left on pasture (n content), per square kilometre?
Bhutan ranks 140th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 141st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Manure left on pasture (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Sao Tome and Principe: Cattle — Manure left on pasture (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-left-on-pasture-n-content-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-left-on-pasture-n-content-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/sao-tome-and-principe/">Bhutan vs Sao Tome and Principe: Cattle — Manure left on pasture (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Manure left on pasture (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle — Manure left on pasture (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.