China, Hong Kong SAR vs Sao Tome and Principe: Cattle — Manure left on pasture

China, Hong Kong SAR
31,374 kg
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
62,002 kg
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
184th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
181st

Cattle — Manure left on pasture over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 62,002 kg against 31,374 kg in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 30,628 kg.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 2.0 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 184th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 181st of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 2 and Sao Tome and Principe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 256,546 kg 142,597 kg 113,949 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 203,398 kg 105,431 kg 97,967 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 53,779 kg 131,424 kg 77,645 kg Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 32,148 kg 155,039 kg 122,891 kg Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 30,496 kg 131,837 kg 101,340 kg Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 32,640 kg 52,550 kg 19,909 kg Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 31,440 kg 61,023 kg 29,583 kg Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure left on pasture, China, Hong Kong SAR or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 62,002 kg against 31,374 kg in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — manure left on pasture between China, Hong Kong SAR and Sao Tome and Principe?
30,628 kg, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for cattle — manure left on pasture?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 184th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 181st of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Manure left on pasture (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Sao Tome and Principe: Cattle — Manure left on pasture. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-left-on-pasture-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-left-on-pasture-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/sao-tome-and-principe/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Sao Tome and Principe: Cattle — Manure left on pasture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Manure left on pasture (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).