Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Cattle — Manure left on pasture (N content)

Middle Africa
2.18 billion kg
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
1.58 billion kg
in 2023
Middle Africa rank
3rd
United Republic of Tanzania rank
4th

Cattle — Manure left on pasture (N content) over time

  • Middle Africa
  • United Republic of Tanzania
500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B196119922023

How they compare

Middle Africa currently reports 2.18 billion kg against 1.58 billion kg in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 600.11 million kg.

That makes Middle Africa's figure about 1.4 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Middle Africa ahead.

Middle Africa ranks 3rd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 4th of 20 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Middle Africa averaged higher in 5 and United Republic of Tanzania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Middle Africa United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 371.03 million kg 373.10 million kg 2.08 million kg United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 447.70 million kg 458.84 million kg 11.14 million kg United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 624.16 million kg 529.09 million kg 95.07 million kg Middle Africa
1990s 819.44 million kg 581.99 million kg 237.46 million kg Middle Africa
2000s 1.13 billion kg 756.83 million kg 372.07 million kg Middle Africa
2010s 1.59 billion kg 1.09 billion kg 501.10 million kg Middle Africa
2020s 2.05 billion kg 1.49 billion kg 555.00 million kg Middle Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure left on pasture, Middle Africa or United Republic of Tanzania?
Middle Africa, at 2.18 billion kg against 1.58 billion kg in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — manure left on pasture between Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania?
600.11 million kg, with Middle Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for cattle — manure left on pasture?
Middle Africa ranks 3rd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 4th of 20 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Manure left on pasture (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Cattle — Manure left on pasture. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-left-on-pasture-n-content/middle-africa/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-left-on-pasture-n-content/middle-africa/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Cattle — Manure left on pasture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Manure left on pasture (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).