Sub-Saharan Africa vs Uruguay: Cattle: Manure left on pasture … left square kilometre volatilises

Sub-Saharan Africa
119.24 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
527.05 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
1st
Uruguay rank
2nd

Cattle: Manure left on pasture … left square kilometre volatilises over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Uruguay
0200400600196119922023

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 527.05 kg per square kilometre against 119.24 kg per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 407.81 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 4.4 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.

Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 2nd of 2 groups.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 46.89 kg per square kilometre 381.77 kg per square kilometre 334.87 kg per square kilometre Uruguay
1970s 53.87 kg per square kilometre 443.22 kg per square kilometre 389.35 kg per square kilometre Uruguay
1980s 60.68 kg per square kilometre 447.6 kg per square kilometre 386.92 kg per square kilometre Uruguay
1990s 65.7 kg per square kilometre 443.48 kg per square kilometre 377.78 kg per square kilometre Uruguay
2000s 79.58 kg per square kilometre 521.92 kg per square kilometre 442.34 kg per square kilometre Uruguay
2010s 100.27 kg per square kilometre 517.32 kg per square kilometre 417.04 kg per square kilometre Uruguay
2020s 115.68 kg per square kilometre 515.83 kg per square kilometre 400.15 kg per square kilometre Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure left on pasture that volatilises (n content), per, Sub-Saharan Africa or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 527.05 kg per square kilometre against 119.24 kg per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — manure left on pasture that volatilises (n content), per between Sub-Saharan Africa and Uruguay?
407.81 kg per square kilometre, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa and Uruguay rank globally for cattle — manure left on pasture that volatilises (n content), per?
Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 2nd of 2 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa vs Uruguay: Cattle — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content-per-square-kilometre/sub-saharan-africa/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content-per-square-kilometre/sub-saharan-africa/uruguay/">Sub-Saharan Africa vs Uruguay: Cattle — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.