Middle Africa vs OECD: Cattle — Manure left on pasture that volatilises

Middle Africa
435.44 million kg
in 2023
OECD
1.89 billion kg
in 2023
Middle Africa rank
3rd
OECD rank
1st

Cattle — Manure left on pasture that volatilises over time

  • Middle Africa
  • OECD
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B196119922023

How they compare

OECD currently reports 1.89 billion kg against 435.44 million kg in Middle Africa, a difference of 1.45 billion kg.

That makes OECD's figure about 4.3 times Middle Africa's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, OECD has been ahead every year.

Middle Africa ranks 3rd and OECD ranks 1st of 20 regions.

OECD has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Middle Africa OECD Difference Ahead
1960s 74.21 million kg 1.72 billion kg 1.65 billion kg OECD
1970s 89.54 million kg 2.06 billion kg 1.97 billion kg OECD
1980s 124.83 million kg 1.96 billion kg 1.83 billion kg OECD
1990s 163.89 million kg 1.89 billion kg 1.73 billion kg OECD
2000s 225.78 million kg 1.87 billion kg 1.64 billion kg OECD
2010s 318.04 million kg 1.86 billion kg 1.54 billion kg OECD
2020s 409.39 million kg 1.88 billion kg 1.47 billion kg OECD

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure left on pasture that volatilises, Middle Africa or OECD?
OECD, at 1.89 billion kg against 435.44 million kg in Middle Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — manure left on pasture that volatilises between Middle Africa and OECD?
1.45 billion kg, with OECD ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and OECD?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Middle Africa and OECD rank globally for cattle — manure left on pasture that volatilises?
Middle Africa ranks 3rd and OECD ranks 1st of 20 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Middle Africa vs OECD: Cattle — Manure left on pasture that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content/middle-africa/oecd/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content/middle-africa/oecd/">Middle Africa vs OECD: Cattle — Manure left on pasture that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).