Peru vs Zimbabwe: Cattle — Manure left on pasture that volatilises

Peru
43.93 million kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
46.94 million kg
in 2023
Peru rank
38th
Zimbabwe rank
36th

Cattle — Manure left on pasture that volatilises over time

  • Peru
  • Zimbabwe
020.0M40.0M60.0M196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 46.94 million kg against 43.93 million kg in Peru, a difference of 3.01 million kg.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Peru ranks 38th and Zimbabwe ranks 36th of 188 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Peru Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 28.50 million kg 30.88 million kg 2.38 million kg Zimbabwe
1970s 31.40 million kg 47.44 million kg 16.03 million kg Zimbabwe
1980s 31.33 million kg 45.81 million kg 14.48 million kg Zimbabwe
1990s 32.86 million kg 43.64 million kg 10.78 million kg Zimbabwe
2000s 39.58 million kg 44.32 million kg 4.74 million kg Zimbabwe
2010s 41.69 million kg 45.30 million kg 3.61 million kg Zimbabwe
2020s 43.40 million kg 44.81 million kg 1.41 million kg Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure left on pasture that volatilises, Peru or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 46.94 million kg against 43.93 million kg in Peru as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — manure left on pasture that volatilises between Peru and Zimbabwe?
3.01 million kg, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Peru and Zimbabwe rank globally for cattle — manure left on pasture that volatilises?
Peru ranks 38th and Zimbabwe ranks 36th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Peru vs Zimbabwe: Cattle — Manure left on pasture that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content/peru/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content/peru/zimbabwe/">Peru vs Zimbabwe: Cattle — Manure left on pasture that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).