Australia vs Costa Rica: Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per capita

Australia
6.83 kg per person
in 2023
Costa Rica
7.22 kg per person
in 2023
Australia rank
29th
Costa Rica rank
26th

Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per capita over time

  • Australia
  • Costa Rica
57.51012.515196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 7.22 kg per person against 6.83 kg per person in Australia, a difference of 0.39 kg per person.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 29th and Costa Rica ranks 26th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 6 and Costa Rica in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Costa Rica Difference Ahead
1960s 12.77 kg per person 4.71 kg per person 8.07 kg per person Australia
1970s 13.94 kg per person 5.72 kg per person 8.23 kg per person Australia
1980s 9.72 kg per person 5.1 kg per person 4.63 kg per person Australia
1990s 9.13 kg per person 5.36 kg per person 3.77 kg per person Australia
2000s 8.87 kg per person 6.3 kg per person 2.56 kg per person Australia
2010s 7.23 kg per person 7.23 kg per person 0.0075 kg per person Australia
2020s 6.09 kg per person 7.01 kg per person 0.9172 kg per person Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure management (manure treated, n content), per capita, Australia or Costa Rica?
Costa Rica, at 7.22 kg per person against 6.83 kg per person in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — manure management (manure treated, n content), per capita between Australia and Costa Rica?
0.39 kg per person, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Costa Rica?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Costa Rica rank globally for cattle — manure management (manure treated, n content), per capita?
Australia ranks 29th and Costa Rica ranks 26th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Costa Rica: Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/australia/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/australia/costa-rica/">Australia vs Costa Rica: Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per capita
Unit
kg per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.