Uganda vs Zimbabwe: Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per capita

Uganda
0.6691 kg per person
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.6091 kg per person
in 2023
Uganda rank
101st
Zimbabwe rank
103rd

Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per capita over time

  • Uganda
  • Zimbabwe
0.50.7511.21.51.8196119922023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 0.6691 kg per person against 0.6091 kg per person in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.06 kg per person.

That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Uganda ranks 101st and Zimbabwe ranks 103rd of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Uganda averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Uganda Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6701 kg per person 1.44 kg per person 0.7746 kg per person Zimbabwe
1970s 0.696 kg per person 1.63 kg per person 0.9373 kg per person Zimbabwe
1980s 0.6041 kg per person 1.16 kg per person 0.5533 kg per person Zimbabwe
1990s 0.5508 kg per person 0.8655 kg per person 0.3148 kg per person Zimbabwe
2000s 0.7018 kg per person 0.7535 kg per person 0.0518 kg per person Zimbabwe
2010s 0.7956 kg per person 0.6604 kg per person 0.1353 kg per person Uganda
2020s 0.6967 kg per person 0.5983 kg per person 0.0983 kg per person Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure management (manure treated, n content), per capita, Uganda or Zimbabwe?
Uganda, at 0.6691 kg per person against 0.6091 kg per person in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — manure management (manure treated, n content), per capita between Uganda and Zimbabwe?
0.06 kg per person, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Uganda and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Uganda and Zimbabwe rank globally for cattle — manure management (manure treated, n content), per capita?
Uganda ranks 101st and Zimbabwe ranks 103rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Uganda vs Zimbabwe: Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/uganda/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/uganda/zimbabwe/">Uganda vs Zimbabwe: Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per capita
Unit
kg per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.