Antigua and Barbuda vs Uruguay: Cattle: Manure management (manure treated, N content) … square

Antigua and Barbuda
241.59 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
203.2 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
49th
Uruguay rank
51st

Cattle: Manure management (manure treated, N content) … square over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Uruguay
200400600800196119922023

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 241.59 kg per square kilometre against 203.2 kg per square kilometre in Uruguay, a difference of 38.39 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Antigua and Barbuda's figure about 1.2 times Uruguay's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Antigua and Barbuda has been ahead every year.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 49th and Uruguay ranks 51st of 167 countries.

Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 278.89 kg per square kilometre 147.34 kg per square kilometre 131.55 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1970s 361.33 kg per square kilometre 138.76 kg per square kilometre 222.58 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1980s 649.55 kg per square kilometre 181.3 kg per square kilometre 468.25 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1990s 688.96 kg per square kilometre 205.58 kg per square kilometre 483.38 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2000s 661.39 kg per square kilometre 213.63 kg per square kilometre 447.76 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 333.05 kg per square kilometre 222.53 kg per square kilometre 110.52 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 255.4 kg per square kilometre 206.71 kg per square kilometre 48.69 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure management (manure treated, n content), per square, Antigua and Barbuda or Uruguay?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 241.59 kg per square kilometre against 203.2 kg per square kilometre in Uruguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — manure management (manure treated, n content), per square between Antigua and Barbuda and Uruguay?
38.39 kg per square kilometre, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Uruguay rank globally for cattle — manure management (manure treated, n content), per square?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 49th and Uruguay ranks 51st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Uruguay: Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/uruguay/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Uruguay: Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.