Bahamas vs Sao Tome and Principe: Cattle: Manure management (manure treated, N content) … square

Bahamas
3.13 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
3.54 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Bahamas rank
155th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
154th

Cattle: Manure management (manure treated, N content) … square over time

  • Bahamas
  • Sao Tome and Principe
2468196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 3.54 kg per square kilometre against 3.13 kg per square kilometre in Bahamas, a difference of 0.41 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Bahamas's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Bahamas ranks 155th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 154th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 4.92 kg per square kilometre 6.65 kg per square kilometre 1.73 kg per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1970s 4.26 kg per square kilometre 4.92 kg per square kilometre 0.6599 kg per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 3.31 kg per square kilometre 6.14 kg per square kilometre 2.83 kg per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 2.97 kg per square kilometre 7.24 kg per square kilometre 4.27 kg per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 3.01 kg per square kilometre 6.67 kg per square kilometre 3.66 kg per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 3.17 kg per square kilometre 3.07 kg per square kilometre 0.1042 kg per square kilometre Bahamas
2020s 3.11 kg per square kilometre 3.49 kg per square kilometre 0.3836 kg per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure management (manure treated, n content), per square, Bahamas or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 3.54 kg per square kilometre against 3.13 kg per square kilometre in Bahamas as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — manure management (manure treated, n content), per square between Bahamas and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.41 kg per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for cattle — manure management (manure treated, n content), per square?
Bahamas ranks 155th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 154th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Sao Tome and Principe: Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/sao-tome-and-principe/">Bahamas vs Sao Tome and Principe: Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.