Belize vs French Polynesia: Cattle: Manure management (manure treated, N content) … square

Belize
13.59 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
French Polynesia
15.12 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Belize rank
133rd
French Polynesia rank
132nd

Cattle: Manure management (manure treated, N content) … square over time

  • Belize
  • French Polynesia
5101520196119922023

How they compare

French Polynesia currently reports 15.12 kg per square kilometre against 13.59 kg per square kilometre in Belize, a difference of 1.53 kg per square kilometre.

That makes French Polynesia's figure about 1.1 times Belize's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was French Polynesia ahead.

Belize ranks 133rd and French Polynesia ranks 132nd of 167 countries.

French Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize French Polynesia Difference Ahead
1960s 6.57 kg per square kilometre 19.39 kg per square kilometre 12.82 kg per square kilometre French Polynesia
1970s 7.78 kg per square kilometre 13.03 kg per square kilometre 5.25 kg per square kilometre French Polynesia
1980s 10.26 kg per square kilometre 15.67 kg per square kilometre 5.41 kg per square kilometre French Polynesia
1990s 4.96 kg per square kilometre 14.11 kg per square kilometre 9.15 kg per square kilometre French Polynesia
2000s 7.42 kg per square kilometre 14.75 kg per square kilometre 7.33 kg per square kilometre French Polynesia
2010s 11.96 kg per square kilometre 13.91 kg per square kilometre 1.95 kg per square kilometre French Polynesia
2020s 13.58 kg per square kilometre 15.95 kg per square kilometre 2.37 kg per square kilometre French Polynesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure management (manure treated, n content), per square, Belize or French Polynesia?
French Polynesia, at 15.12 kg per square kilometre against 13.59 kg per square kilometre in Belize as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — manure management (manure treated, n content), per square between Belize and French Polynesia?
1.53 kg per square kilometre, with French Polynesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and French Polynesia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Belize and French Polynesia rank globally for cattle — manure management (manure treated, n content), per square?
Belize ranks 133rd and French Polynesia ranks 132nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belize vs French Polynesia: Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/belize/french-polynesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/belize/french-polynesia/">Belize vs French Polynesia: Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.