China vs Uganda: Cattle: Manure management (manure treated, N content) … square

China
192.07 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
162.36 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
55th
Uganda rank
58th

Cattle: Manure management (manure treated, N content) … square over time

  • China
  • Uganda
50100150200250196119922023

How they compare

China currently reports 192.07 kg per square kilometre against 162.36 kg per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 29.71 kg per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 1.2 times Uganda's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.

China ranks 55th and Uganda ranks 58th of 167 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 107.11 kg per square kilometre 29.69 kg per square kilometre 77.42 kg per square kilometre China
1970s 114.69 kg per square kilometre 40.57 kg per square kilometre 74.12 kg per square kilometre China
1980s 130.61 kg per square kilometre 44.94 kg per square kilometre 85.67 kg per square kilometre China
1990s 196.4 kg per square kilometre 55.88 kg per square kilometre 140.51 kg per square kilometre China
2000s 206.41 kg per square kilometre 98.23 kg per square kilometre 108.18 kg per square kilometre China
2010s 161.86 kg per square kilometre 147.42 kg per square kilometre 14.44 kg per square kilometre China
2020s 181.32 kg per square kilometre 161.69 kg per square kilometre 19.63 kg per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure management (manure treated, n content), per square, China or Uganda?
China, at 192.07 kg per square kilometre against 162.36 kg per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — manure management (manure treated, n content), per square between China and Uganda?
29.71 kg per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Uganda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Uganda rank globally for cattle — manure management (manure treated, n content), per square?
China ranks 55th and Uganda ranks 58th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Uganda: Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/china/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/china/uganda/">China vs Uganda: Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.