Congo vs Papua New Guinea: Cattle: Manure management (manure treated, N content) … square

Congo
0.8155 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Papua New Guinea
1.15 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
162nd
Papua New Guinea rank
160th

Cattle: Manure management (manure treated, N content) … square over time

  • Congo
  • Papua New Guinea
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 1.15 kg per square kilometre against 0.8155 kg per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0.3345 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.4 times Congo's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 162nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 160th of 167 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0774 kg per square kilometre 0.6299 kg per square kilometre 0.5525 kg per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
1970s 0.1398 kg per square kilometre 1.5 kg per square kilometre 1.36 kg per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
1980s 0.1842 kg per square kilometre 1.43 kg per square kilometre 1.25 kg per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
1990s 0.1927 kg per square kilometre 1.14 kg per square kilometre 0.9522 kg per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
2000s 0.4783 kg per square kilometre 1.15 kg per square kilometre 0.6669 kg per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
2010s 0.8299 kg per square kilometre 1.17 kg per square kilometre 0.3397 kg per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
2020s 0.8214 kg per square kilometre 1.15 kg per square kilometre 0.3328 kg per square kilometre Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure management (manure treated, n content), per square, Congo or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 1.15 kg per square kilometre against 0.8155 kg per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — manure management (manure treated, n content), per square between Congo and Papua New Guinea?
0.3345 kg per square kilometre, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Papua New Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Papua New Guinea rank globally for cattle — manure management (manure treated, n content), per square?
Congo ranks 162nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 160th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Papua New Guinea: Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/papua-new-guinea/">Congo vs Papua New Guinea: Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.