New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: Cattle: Manure management (manure treated, N content) … square

New Caledonia
23.9 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
25.73 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia rank
118th
Zimbabwe rank
117th

Cattle: Manure management (manure treated, N content) … square over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Zimbabwe
010203040196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 25.73 kg per square kilometre against 23.9 kg per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 1.83 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 118th and Zimbabwe ranks 117th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 6 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 33.17 kg per square kilometre 16.66 kg per square kilometre 16.51 kg per square kilometre New Caledonia
1970s 36.51 kg per square kilometre 25.23 kg per square kilometre 11.28 kg per square kilometre New Caledonia
1980s 37.1 kg per square kilometre 25.29 kg per square kilometre 11.81 kg per square kilometre New Caledonia
1990s 34.01 kg per square kilometre 24.54 kg per square kilometre 9.47 kg per square kilometre New Caledonia
2000s 30.21 kg per square kilometre 24.19 kg per square kilometre 6.02 kg per square kilometre New Caledonia
2010s 26.07 kg per square kilometre 24.36 kg per square kilometre 1.72 kg per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 24.21 kg per square kilometre 24.65 kg per square kilometre 0.4447 kg per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure management (manure treated, n content), per square, New Caledonia or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 25.73 kg per square kilometre against 23.9 kg per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — manure management (manure treated, n content), per square between New Caledonia and Zimbabwe?
1.83 kg per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do New Caledonia and Zimbabwe rank globally for cattle — manure management (manure treated, n content), per square?
New Caledonia ranks 118th and Zimbabwe ranks 117th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/zimbabwe/">New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.