Annex I countries vs India: Cattle — Manure management

Annex I countries
7.20 billion kg
in 2023
India
1.09 billion kg
in 2023
Annex I countries rank
3rd
India rank
5th

Cattle — Manure management over time

  • Annex I countries
  • India
05.0B10.0B15.0B196119922023

How they compare

Annex I countries currently reports 7.20 billion kg against 1.09 billion kg in India, a difference of 6.10 billion kg.

That makes Annex I countries's figure about 6.6 times India's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Annex I countries has been ahead every year.

Annex I countries ranks 3rd and India ranks 5th of 37 groups.

Annex I countries has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Annex I countries India Difference Ahead
1960s 12.85 billion kg 741.74 million kg 12.11 billion kg Annex I countries
1970s 13.80 billion kg 775.17 million kg 13.02 billion kg Annex I countries
1980s 14.05 billion kg 869.34 million kg 13.18 billion kg Annex I countries
1990s 10.96 billion kg 918.34 million kg 10.04 billion kg Annex I countries
2000s 8.38 billion kg 916.51 million kg 7.46 billion kg Annex I countries
2010s 7.65 billion kg 979.50 million kg 6.67 billion kg Annex I countries
2020s 7.31 billion kg 1.07 billion kg 6.24 billion kg Annex I countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure management, Annex I countries or India?
Annex I countries, at 7.20 billion kg against 1.09 billion kg in India as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — manure management between Annex I countries and India?
6.10 billion kg, with Annex I countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Annex I countries and India?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Annex I countries and India rank globally for cattle — manure management?
Annex I countries ranks 3rd and India ranks 5th of 37 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Annex I countries vs India: Cattle — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/annex-i-countries/india/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/annex-i-countries/india/">Annex I countries vs India: Cattle — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).