Australia and New Zealand vs Timor-Leste: Cattle — Manure management

Australia and New Zealand
301.54 million kg
in 2023
Timor-Leste
5.00 million kg
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
13th
Timor-Leste rank
14th

Cattle — Manure management over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Timor-Leste
0100.0M200.0M300.0M196119922023

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 301.54 million kg against 5.00 million kg in Timor-Leste, a difference of 296.54 million kg.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 60.2 times Timor-Leste's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 13th and Timor-Leste ranks 14th of 190 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Timor-Leste Difference Ahead
1960s 214.69 million kg 798,606 kg 213.89 million kg Australia and New Zealand
1970s 268.83 million kg 1.37 million kg 267.46 million kg Australia and New Zealand
1980s 231.52 million kg 915,273 kg 230.61 million kg Australia and New Zealand
1990s 255.56 million kg 2.23 million kg 253.32 million kg Australia and New Zealand
2000s 289.13 million kg 2.95 million kg 286.18 million kg Australia and New Zealand
2010s 298.49 million kg 4.25 million kg 294.24 million kg Australia and New Zealand
2020s 281.38 million kg 4.90 million kg 276.47 million kg Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure management, Australia and New Zealand or Timor-Leste?
Australia and New Zealand, at 301.54 million kg against 5.00 million kg in Timor-Leste as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — manure management between Australia and New Zealand and Timor-Leste?
296.54 million kg, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Timor-Leste?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Timor-Leste rank globally for cattle — manure management?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 13th and Timor-Leste ranks 14th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Timor-Leste: Cattle — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/australia-and-new-zealand/timor-leste-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/australia-and-new-zealand/timor-leste-2/">Australia and New Zealand vs Timor-Leste: Cattle — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).