Brazil vs United Republic of Tanzania: Cattle — Manure management

Brazil
791.70 million kg
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
77.59 million kg
in 2023
Brazil rank
7th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
5th

Cattle — Manure management over time

  • Brazil
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 791.70 million kg against 77.59 million kg in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 714.10 million kg.

That makes Brazil's figure about 10.2 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.

Brazil ranks 7th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 5th of 190 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 399.24 million kg 16.19 million kg 383.05 million kg Brazil
1970s 563.30 million kg 19.74 million kg 543.56 million kg Brazil
1980s 814.32 million kg 24.19 million kg 790.14 million kg Brazil
1990s 899.62 million kg 28.29 million kg 871.32 million kg Brazil
2000s 972.02 million kg 41.53 million kg 930.48 million kg Brazil
2010s 997.33 million kg 56.95 million kg 940.38 million kg Brazil
2020s 793.83 million kg 73.69 million kg 720.14 million kg Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure management, Brazil or United Republic of Tanzania?
Brazil, at 791.70 million kg against 77.59 million kg in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — manure management between Brazil and United Republic of Tanzania?
714.10 million kg, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for cattle — manure management?
Brazil ranks 7th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 5th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs United Republic of Tanzania: Cattle — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/brazil/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/brazil/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Brazil vs United Republic of Tanzania: Cattle — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).