Canada vs Oceania: Cattle — Manure management

Canada
168.13 million kg
in 2023
Oceania
305.10 million kg
in 2023
Canada rank
26th
Oceania rank
27th

Cattle — Manure management over time

  • Canada
  • Oceania
0100.0M200.0M300.0M196119922023

How they compare

Oceania currently reports 305.10 million kg against 168.13 million kg in Canada, a difference of 136.97 million kg.

That makes Oceania's figure about 1.8 times Canada's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Canada ahead.

Canada ranks 26th and Oceania ranks 27th of 206 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 1 and Oceania in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Oceania Difference Ahead
1960s 313.64 million kg 217.16 million kg 96.48 million kg Canada
1970s 269.76 million kg 272.55 million kg 2.78 million kg Oceania
1980s 220.38 million kg 235.66 million kg 15.28 million kg Oceania
1990s 199.71 million kg 260.40 million kg 60.68 million kg Oceania
2000s 195.49 million kg 293.91 million kg 98.42 million kg Oceania
2010s 173.04 million kg 302.55 million kg 129.50 million kg Oceania
2020s 170.13 million kg 284.70 million kg 114.57 million kg Oceania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure management, Canada or Oceania?
Oceania, at 305.10 million kg against 168.13 million kg in Canada as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — manure management between Canada and Oceania?
136.97 million kg, with Oceania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Oceania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Canada and Oceania rank globally for cattle — manure management?
Canada ranks 26th and Oceania ranks 27th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Oceania: Cattle — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/canada/oceania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/canada/oceania/">Canada vs Oceania: Cattle — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).