China, Hong Kong SAR vs Grenada: Cattle — Manure management

China, Hong Kong SAR
30,140 kg
in 2023
Grenada
38,187 kg
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
178th
Grenada rank
175th

Cattle — Manure management over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Grenada
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 38,187 kg against 30,140 kg in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 8,047 kg.

That makes Grenada's figure about 1.3 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 178th and Grenada ranks 175th of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 4 and Grenada in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Grenada Difference Ahead
1960s 339,005 kg 71,714 kg 267,291 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 265,822 kg 90,347 kg 175,475 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 88,795 kg 41,857 kg 46,938 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 39,358 kg 30,162 kg 9,196 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 30,175 kg 32,257 kg 2,082 kg Grenada
2010s 31,331 kg 32,841 kg 1,509 kg Grenada
2020s 30,202 kg 37,693 kg 7,491 kg Grenada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure management, China, Hong Kong SAR or Grenada?
Grenada, at 38,187 kg against 30,140 kg in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — manure management between China, Hong Kong SAR and Grenada?
8,047 kg, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Grenada?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Grenada rank globally for cattle — manure management?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 178th and Grenada ranks 175th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Grenada: Cattle — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/grenada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/grenada/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Grenada: Cattle — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).