Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Pakistan: Cattle — Manure management

Democratic Republic of the Congo
1.52 million kg
in 2023
Pakistan
300.81 million kg
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
17th
Pakistan rank
14th

Cattle — Manure management over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Pakistan
0100.0M200.0M300.0M196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 300.81 million kg against 1.52 million kg in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 299.30 million kg.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 198.4 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 17th and Pakistan ranks 14th of 20 countries.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 733,065 kg 63.92 million kg 63.19 million kg Pakistan
1970s 911,234 kg 67.85 million kg 66.94 million kg Pakistan
1980s 1.07 million kg 79.51 million kg 78.44 million kg Pakistan
1990s 969,228 kg 100.56 million kg 99.59 million kg Pakistan
2000s 644,758 kg 144.33 million kg 143.68 million kg Pakistan
2010s 821,438 kg 220.87 million kg 220.05 million kg Pakistan
2020s 1.31 million kg 284.81 million kg 283.50 million kg Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure management, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 300.81 million kg against 1.52 million kg in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — manure management between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Pakistan?
299.30 million kg, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Pakistan rank globally for cattle — manure management?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 17th and Pakistan ranks 14th of 20 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Pakistan: Cattle — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/pakistan/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Pakistan: Cattle — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).