Egypt, Arab Republic of vs Estonia, Republic of: Cattle β€” Manure management

Egypt, Arab Republic of
10.92 million kg
in 2023
Estonia, Republic of
12.45 million kg
in 2023
Egypt, Arab Republic of rank
96th
Estonia, Republic of rank
94th

Cattle β€” Manure management over time

  • Egypt, Arab Republic of
  • Estonia, Republic of
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M196119922023

How they compare

Estonia, Republic of currently reports 12.45 million kg against 10.92 million kg in Egypt, Arab Republic of, a difference of 1.53 million kg.

That makes Estonia, Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Egypt, Arab Republic of's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia, Republic of ahead.

Egypt, Arab Republic of ranks 96th and Estonia, Republic of ranks 94th of 188 countries.

Estonia, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt, Arab Republic of Estonia, Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 9.01 million kg 25.43 million kg 16.43 million kg Estonia, Republic of
2000s 11.89 million kg 14.45 million kg 2.57 million kg Estonia, Republic of
2010s 12.08 million kg 13.14 million kg 1.06 million kg Estonia, Republic of
2020s 10.77 million kg 12.72 million kg 1.95 million kg Estonia, Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle β€” manure management, Egypt, Arab Republic of or Estonia, Republic of?
Estonia, Republic of, at 12.45 million kg against 10.92 million kg in Egypt, Arab Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle β€” manure management between Egypt, Arab Republic of and Estonia, Republic of?
1.53 million kg, with Estonia, Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt, Arab Republic of and Estonia, Republic of?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Egypt, Arab Republic of and Estonia, Republic of rank globally for cattle β€” manure management?
Egypt, Arab Republic of ranks 96th and Estonia, Republic of ranks 94th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle β€” Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt, Arab Republic of vs Estonia, Republic of: Cattle β€” Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/egypt-arab-rep/estonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/egypt-arab-rep/estonia/">Egypt, Arab Republic of vs Estonia, Republic of: Cattle β€” Manure management</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle β€” Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).