Ethiopia vs New Zealand: Cattle — Manure management

Ethiopia
105.44 million kg
in 2023
New Zealand
119.48 million kg
in 2023
Ethiopia rank
35th
New Zealand rank
32nd

Cattle — Manure management over time

  • Ethiopia
  • New Zealand
40.0M60.0M80.0M100.0M120.0M140.0M196119922023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 119.48 million kg against 105.44 million kg in Ethiopia, a difference of 14.05 million kg.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Ethiopia ranks 35th and New Zealand ranks 32nd of 190 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 47.64 million kg 95.21 million kg 47.57 million kg New Zealand
2000s 60.05 million kg 110.56 million kg 50.51 million kg New Zealand
2010s 101.47 million kg 127.95 million kg 26.48 million kg New Zealand
2020s 100.18 million kg 122.76 million kg 22.58 million kg New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure management, Ethiopia or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 119.48 million kg against 105.44 million kg in Ethiopia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — manure management between Ethiopia and New Zealand?
14.05 million kg, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and New Zealand?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Ethiopia and New Zealand rank globally for cattle — manure management?
Ethiopia ranks 35th and New Zealand ranks 32nd of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia vs New Zealand: Cattle — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/ethiopia/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/ethiopia/new-zealand/">Ethiopia vs New Zealand: Cattle — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).