Iceland vs Mauritania: Cattle — Manure management

Iceland
4.14 million kg
in 2023
Mauritania
3.79 million kg
in 2023
Iceland rank
128th
Mauritania rank
130th

Cattle — Manure management over time

  • Iceland
  • Mauritania
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 4.14 million kg against 3.79 million kg in Mauritania, a difference of 345,990 kg.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 128th and Mauritania ranks 130th of 206 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 3.86 million kg 3.16 million kg 703,542 kg Iceland
1970s 3.90 million kg 2.20 million kg 1.70 million kg Iceland
1980s 3.97 million kg 2.26 million kg 1.71 million kg Iceland
1990s 4.07 million kg 2.58 million kg 1.49 million kg Iceland
2000s 3.65 million kg 3.00 million kg 648,094 kg Iceland
2010s 3.91 million kg 3.48 million kg 438,451 kg Iceland
2020s 4.06 million kg 3.79 million kg 269,938 kg Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure management, Iceland or Mauritania?
Iceland, at 4.14 million kg against 3.79 million kg in Mauritania as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — manure management between Iceland and Mauritania?
345,990 kg, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Mauritania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Mauritania rank globally for cattle — manure management?
Iceland ranks 128th and Mauritania ranks 130th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Mauritania: Cattle — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/iceland/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/iceland/mauritania/">Iceland vs Mauritania: Cattle — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).