Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Micronesia: Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content) over time
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
- Micronesia
How they compare
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 1.27 billion kg against 137,652 kg in Micronesia, a difference of 1.27 billion kg.
That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 9,194.1 times Micronesia's.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 17th and Micronesia ranks 19th of 33 groups.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Micronesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 562.19 million kg | 101,396 kg | 562.09 million kg | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2000s | 779.61 million kg | 103,350 kg | 779.51 million kg | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2010s | 1.09 billion kg | 126,173 kg | 1.09 billion kg | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | 1.24 billion kg | 135,926 kg | 1.24 billion kg | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cattle — manure management, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Micronesia?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 1.27 billion kg against 137,652 kg in Micronesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in cattle — manure management between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Micronesia?
- 1.27 billion kg, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Micronesia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
- How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Micronesia rank globally for cattle — manure management?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 17th and Micronesia ranks 19th of 33 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).