Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Yugoslav SFR: Cattle — Manure management

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1.27 billion kg
in 2023
Yugoslav SFR
271.81 million kg
in 1991
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
17th
Yugoslav SFR rank
18th

Cattle — Manure management over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Yugoslav SFR
250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B1.2B196119922023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 1.27 billion kg against 271.81 million kg in Yugoslav SFR, a difference of 993.76 million kg.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 4.7 times Yugoslav SFR's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Yugoslav SFR ahead.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 17th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 18th of 33 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 1 and Yugoslav SFR in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Yugoslav SFR Difference Ahead
1960s 230.77 million kg 288.80 million kg 58.04 million kg Yugoslav SFR
1970s 268.21 million kg 312.51 million kg 44.30 million kg Yugoslav SFR
1980s 304.45 million kg 310.00 million kg 5.56 million kg Yugoslav SFR
1990s 328.10 million kg 278.23 million kg 49.87 million kg Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure management, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Yugoslav SFR?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 1.27 billion kg against 271.81 million kg in Yugoslav SFR as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — manure management between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Yugoslav SFR?
993.76 million kg, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Yugoslav SFR?
31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for cattle — manure management?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 17th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 18th of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Yugoslav SFR: Cattle — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/yugoslav-sfr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/yugoslav-sfr/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Yugoslav SFR: Cattle — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).