New Zealand vs Sudan (former): Cattle — Manure management

New Zealand
119.48 million kg
in 2023
Sudan (former)
110.06 million kg
in 2011
New Zealand rank
32nd
Sudan (former) rank
34th

Cattle — Manure management over time

  • New Zealand
  • Sudan (former)
025.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M125.0M196119922023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 119.48 million kg against 110.06 million kg in Sudan (former), a difference of 9.42 million kg.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Sudan (former)'s.

Across all 51 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

New Zealand ranks 32nd and Sudan (former) ranks 34th of 190 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Sudan (former) Difference Ahead
1960s 69.61 million kg 14.98 million kg 54.64 million kg New Zealand
1970s 78.12 million kg 20.63 million kg 57.50 million kg New Zealand
1980s 79.28 million kg 34.50 million kg 44.78 million kg New Zealand
1990s 91.66 million kg 53.28 million kg 38.38 million kg New Zealand
2000s 110.56 million kg 100.14 million kg 10.42 million kg New Zealand
2010s 123.47 million kg 110.01 million kg 13.47 million kg New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure management, New Zealand or Sudan (former)?
New Zealand, at 119.48 million kg against 110.06 million kg in Sudan (former) as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — manure management between New Zealand and Sudan (former)?
9.42 million kg, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Sudan (former)?
51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
How do New Zealand and Sudan (former) rank globally for cattle — manure management?
New Zealand ranks 32nd and Sudan (former) ranks 34th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Sudan (former): Cattle — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/new-zealand/sudan-former/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/new-zealand/sudan-former/">New Zealand vs Sudan (former): Cattle — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).