Sub-Saharan Africa vs Uzbekistan: Cattle — Manure management

Sub-Saharan Africa
581.09 million kg
in 2023
Uzbekistan
409.96 million kg
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
23rd
Uzbekistan rank
11th

Cattle — Manure management over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Uzbekistan
100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M500.0M600.0M196119922023

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 581.09 million kg against 409.96 million kg in Uzbekistan, a difference of 171.13 million kg.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa's figure about 1.4 times Uzbekistan's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa has been ahead every year.

Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 23rd and Uzbekistan ranks 11th of 33 groups.

Sub-Saharan Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 275.31 million kg 155.89 million kg 119.42 million kg Sub-Saharan Africa
2000s 345.90 million kg 187.15 million kg 158.75 million kg Sub-Saharan Africa
2010s 502.46 million kg 313.48 million kg 188.98 million kg Sub-Saharan Africa
2020s 563.62 million kg 394.96 million kg 168.66 million kg Sub-Saharan Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure management, Sub-Saharan Africa or Uzbekistan?
Sub-Saharan Africa, at 581.09 million kg against 409.96 million kg in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — manure management between Sub-Saharan Africa and Uzbekistan?
171.13 million kg, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa and Uzbekistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa and Uzbekistan rank globally for cattle — manure management?
Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 23rd and Uzbekistan ranks 11th of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa vs Uzbekistan: Cattle — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/sub-saharan-africa/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/sub-saharan-africa/uzbekistan/">Sub-Saharan Africa vs Uzbekistan: Cattle — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).