Angola vs Zimbabwe: Cattle, non-dairy — Losses from manure treated

Angola
753,450 kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
752,132 kg
in 2023
Angola rank
80th
Zimbabwe rank
81st

Cattle, non-dairy — Losses from manure treated over time

  • Angola
  • Zimbabwe
200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196119922023

How they compare

Angola currently reports 753,450 kg against 752,132 kg in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1,318 kg.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Angola ranks 80th and Zimbabwe ranks 81st of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 245,346 kg 499,247 kg 253,902 kg Zimbabwe
1970s 403,513 kg 772,952 kg 369,439 kg Zimbabwe
1980s 463,294 kg 730,783 kg 267,490 kg Zimbabwe
1990s 476,312 kg 688,782 kg 212,470 kg Zimbabwe
2000s 583,073 kg 711,932 kg 128,859 kg Zimbabwe
2010s 707,415 kg 733,756 kg 26,340 kg Zimbabwe
2020s 747,473 kg 716,377 kg 31,096 kg Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle, non-dairy — losses from manure treated, Angola or Zimbabwe?
Angola, at 753,450 kg against 752,132 kg in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle, non-dairy — losses from manure treated between Angola and Zimbabwe?
1,318 kg, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Angola and Zimbabwe rank globally for cattle, non-dairy — losses from manure treated?
Angola ranks 80th and Zimbabwe ranks 81st of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle, non-dairy — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Zimbabwe: Cattle, non-dairy — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/angola/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/angola/zimbabwe/">Angola vs Zimbabwe: Cattle, non-dairy — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle, non-dairy — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).