China, Hong Kong SAR vs United Arab Emirates: Cattle, non-dairy — Losses from manure treated

China, Hong Kong SAR
11,218 kg
in 2023
United Arab Emirates
13,043 kg
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
135th
United Arab Emirates rank
134th

Cattle, non-dairy — Losses from manure treated over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • United Arab Emirates
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

United Arab Emirates currently reports 13,043 kg against 11,218 kg in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 1,825 kg.

That makes United Arab Emirates's figure about 1.2 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 135th and United Arab Emirates ranks 134th of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 6 and United Arab Emirates in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
1960s 76,303 kg 775.98 kg 75,527 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 60,987 kg 3,701 kg 57,287 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 13,041 kg 4,532 kg 8,509 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 10,082 kg 6,626 kg 3,456 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 10,757 kg 10,223 kg 534.59 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 11,674 kg 11,610 kg 64.09 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 11,241 kg 12,843 kg 1,601 kg United Arab Emirates

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle, non-dairy — losses from manure treated, China, Hong Kong SAR or United Arab Emirates?
United Arab Emirates, at 13,043 kg against 11,218 kg in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle, non-dairy — losses from manure treated between China, Hong Kong SAR and United Arab Emirates?
1,825 kg, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and United Arab Emirates?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and United Arab Emirates rank globally for cattle, non-dairy — losses from manure treated?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 135th and United Arab Emirates ranks 134th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle, non-dairy — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs United Arab Emirates: Cattle, non-dairy — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/united-arab-emirates/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/united-arab-emirates/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs United Arab Emirates: Cattle, non-dairy — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle, non-dairy — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).