Congo vs Eswatini: Cattle, non-dairy — Losses from manure treated

Congo
51,617 kg
in 2023
Eswatini
62,753 kg
in 2023
Congo rank
135th
Eswatini rank
132nd

Cattle, non-dairy — Losses from manure treated over time

  • Congo
  • Eswatini
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 62,753 kg against 51,617 kg in Congo, a difference of 11,136 kg.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 135th and Eswatini ranks 132nd of 206 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 4,309 kg 64,427 kg 60,118 kg Eswatini
1970s 7,828 kg 76,871 kg 69,043 kg Eswatini
1980s 10,342 kg 79,147 kg 68,806 kg Eswatini
1990s 10,981 kg 83,978 kg 72,998 kg Eswatini
2000s 29,955 kg 70,624 kg 40,669 kg Eswatini
2010s 53,170 kg 70,901 kg 17,731 kg Eswatini
2020s 52,007 kg 65,509 kg 13,502 kg Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle, non-dairy — losses from manure treated, Congo or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 62,753 kg against 51,617 kg in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle, non-dairy — losses from manure treated between Congo and Eswatini?
11,136 kg, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Eswatini?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Eswatini rank globally for cattle, non-dairy — losses from manure treated?
Congo ranks 135th and Eswatini ranks 132nd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle, non-dairy — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Eswatini: Cattle, non-dairy — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/congo-rep/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/congo-rep/eswatini/">Congo vs Eswatini: Cattle, non-dairy — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle, non-dairy — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).