South Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Cattle, non-dairy — Losses from manure treated

South Sudan
874,826 kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
752,132 kg
in 2023
South Sudan rank
78th
Zimbabwe rank
81st

Cattle, non-dairy — Losses from manure treated over time

  • South Sudan
  • Zimbabwe
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196119922023

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 874,826 kg against 752,132 kg in Zimbabwe, a difference of 122,694 kg.

That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

South Sudan ranks 78th and Zimbabwe ranks 81st of 190 countries.

South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Sudan Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2010s 735,926 kg 720,708 kg 15,218 kg South Sudan
2020s 851,675 kg 716,377 kg 135,298 kg South Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle, non-dairy — losses from manure treated, South Sudan or Zimbabwe?
South Sudan, at 874,826 kg against 752,132 kg in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle, non-dairy — losses from manure treated between South Sudan and Zimbabwe?
122,694 kg, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Zimbabwe?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do South Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for cattle, non-dairy — losses from manure treated?
South Sudan ranks 78th and Zimbabwe ranks 81st of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle, non-dairy — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Cattle, non-dairy — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/south-sudan/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/south-sudan/zimbabwe/">South Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Cattle, non-dairy — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle, non-dairy — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).