Bahamas vs Mauritius: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils

Bahamas
31.66 kg
in 2023
Mauritius
229.14 kg
in 2023
Bahamas rank
190th
Mauritius rank
187th

Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Bahamas
  • Mauritius
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 229.14 kg against 31.66 kg in Bahamas, a difference of 197.48 kg.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 7.2 times Bahamas's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

Bahamas ranks 190th and Mauritius ranks 187th of 190 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 843.4 kg 23,033 kg 22,190 kg Mauritius
1970s 349.87 kg 16,307 kg 15,957 kg Mauritius
1980s 138.27 kg 15,541 kg 15,403 kg Mauritius
1990s 59.71 kg 12,025 kg 11,966 kg Mauritius
2000s 19.52 kg 3,869 kg 3,849 kg Mauritius
2010s 17.11 kg 1,049 kg 1,032 kg Mauritius
2020s 31.16 kg 515.73 kg 484.57 kg Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle, non-dairy — manure applied to soils, Bahamas or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 229.14 kg against 31.66 kg in Bahamas as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle, non-dairy — manure applied to soils between Bahamas and Mauritius?
197.48 kg, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Mauritius?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and Mauritius rank globally for cattle, non-dairy — manure applied to soils?
Bahamas ranks 190th and Mauritius ranks 187th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Mauritius: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/bahamas-the/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/bahamas-the/mauritius/">Bahamas vs Mauritius: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).