Congo vs Eswatini: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils

Congo
206,470 kg
in 2023
Eswatini
251,012 kg
in 2023
Congo rank
154th
Eswatini rank
151st

Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Congo
  • Eswatini
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 251,012 kg against 206,470 kg in Congo, a difference of 44,542 kg.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 154th and Eswatini ranks 151st of 206 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 17,235 kg 257,707 kg 240,472 kg Eswatini
1970s 31,311 kg 307,486 kg 276,174 kg Eswatini
1980s 41,367 kg 316,589 kg 275,222 kg Eswatini
1990s 43,924 kg 335,914 kg 291,990 kg Eswatini
2000s 119,820 kg 282,495 kg 162,675 kg Eswatini
2010s 212,679 kg 283,602 kg 70,923 kg Eswatini
2020s 208,028 kg 262,034 kg 54,006 kg Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle, non-dairy — manure applied to soils, Congo or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 251,012 kg against 206,470 kg in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle, non-dairy — manure applied to soils between Congo and Eswatini?
44,542 kg, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Eswatini?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Eswatini rank globally for cattle, non-dairy — manure applied to soils?
Congo ranks 154th and Eswatini ranks 151st of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Eswatini: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/congo-rep/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/congo-rep/eswatini/">Congo vs Eswatini: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).