Costa Rica vs Rwanda: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils

Costa Rica
556,080 kg
in 2023
Rwanda
690,514 kg
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
125th
Rwanda rank
122nd

Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Rwanda
200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 690,514 kg against 556,080 kg in Costa Rica, a difference of 134,434 kg.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Costa Rica's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 125th and Rwanda ranks 122nd of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 4 and Rwanda in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 416,275 kg 311,573 kg 104,701 kg Costa Rica
1970s 615,720 kg 380,432 kg 235,288 kg Costa Rica
1980s 797,703 kg 304,586 kg 493,118 kg Costa Rica
1990s 567,951 kg 251,480 kg 316,472 kg Costa Rica
2000s 250,233 kg 475,676 kg 225,443 kg Rwanda
2010s 253,260 kg 588,798 kg 335,539 kg Rwanda
2020s 447,356 kg 716,985 kg 269,629 kg Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle, non-dairy — manure applied to soils, Costa Rica or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 690,514 kg against 556,080 kg in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle, non-dairy — manure applied to soils between Costa Rica and Rwanda?
134,434 kg, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Rwanda rank globally for cattle, non-dairy — manure applied to soils?
Costa Rica ranks 125th and Rwanda ranks 122nd of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Rwanda: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/costa-rica/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/costa-rica/rwanda/">Costa Rica vs Rwanda: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).