Jamaica vs Puerto Rico: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils that leaches

Jamaica
17,754 kg
in 2023
Puerto Rico
19,959 kg
in 2023
Jamaica rank
154th
Puerto Rico rank
152nd

Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils that leaches over time

  • Jamaica
  • Puerto Rico
20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

Puerto Rico currently reports 19,959 kg against 17,754 kg in Jamaica, a difference of 2,205 kg.

That makes Puerto Rico's figure about 1.1 times Jamaica's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Jamaica ranks 154th and Puerto Rico ranks 152nd of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 2 and Puerto Rico in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1960s 25,452 kg 37,576 kg 12,124 kg Puerto Rico
1970s 27,098 kg 42,650 kg 15,552 kg Puerto Rico
1980s 34,261 kg 49,527 kg 15,266 kg Puerto Rico
1990s 47,549 kg 41,670 kg 5,878 kg Jamaica
2000s 35,341 kg 33,955 kg 1,386 kg Jamaica
2010s 18,559 kg 22,295 kg 3,736 kg Puerto Rico
2020s 18,060 kg 19,693 kg 1,633 kg Puerto Rico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle, non-dairy — manure applied to soils that leaches, Jamaica or Puerto Rico?
Puerto Rico, at 19,959 kg against 17,754 kg in Jamaica as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle, non-dairy — manure applied to soils that leaches between Jamaica and Puerto Rico?
2,205 kg, with Puerto Rico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Puerto Rico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and Puerto Rico rank globally for cattle, non-dairy — manure applied to soils that leaches?
Jamaica ranks 154th and Puerto Rico ranks 152nd of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Puerto Rico: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils that leaches. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-manure-applied-to-soils-that-leaches-n-content/jamaica/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-manure-applied-to-soils-that-leaches-n-content/jamaica/puerto-rico-us/">Jamaica vs Puerto Rico: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils that leaches</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).