Central African Republic vs Sri Lanka: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Central African Republic
574,106 kg
in 2023
Sri Lanka
518,959 kg
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
91st
Sri Lanka rank
93rd

Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Sri Lanka
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M196119922023

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 574,106 kg against 518,959 kg in Sri Lanka, a difference of 55,147 kg.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 91st and Sri Lanka ranks 93rd of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 58,660 kg 901,637 kg 842,977 kg Sri Lanka
1970s 111,177 kg 922,715 kg 811,538 kg Sri Lanka
1980s 243,458 kg 982,192 kg 738,735 kg Sri Lanka
1990s 327,153 kg 824,361 kg 497,208 kg Sri Lanka
2000s 410,809 kg 624,986 kg 214,177 kg Sri Lanka
2010s 516,870 kg 545,346 kg 28,476 kg Sri Lanka
2020s 559,397 kg 516,807 kg 42,590 kg Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle, non-dairy — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Central African Republic or Sri Lanka?
Central African Republic, at 574,106 kg against 518,959 kg in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle, non-dairy — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Central African Republic and Sri Lanka?
55,147 kg, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Sri Lanka?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Sri Lanka rank globally for cattle, non-dairy — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Central African Republic ranks 91st and Sri Lanka ranks 93rd of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Sri Lanka: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/central-african-republic/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/central-african-republic/sri-lanka/">Central African Republic vs Sri Lanka: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).