Costa Rica vs Rwanda: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Costa Rica
111,216 kg
in 2023
Rwanda
138,103 kg
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
125th
Rwanda rank
122nd

Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Rwanda
50.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 138,103 kg against 111,216 kg in Costa Rica, a difference of 26,887 kg.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Costa Rica's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 125th and Rwanda ranks 122nd of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 4 and Rwanda in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 83,255 kg 62,315 kg 20,940 kg Costa Rica
1970s 123,144 kg 76,086 kg 47,058 kg Costa Rica
1980s 159,541 kg 60,917 kg 98,624 kg Costa Rica
1990s 113,590 kg 50,296 kg 63,294 kg Costa Rica
2000s 50,047 kg 95,135 kg 45,089 kg Rwanda
2010s 50,652 kg 117,760 kg 67,108 kg Rwanda
2020s 89,471 kg 143,397 kg 53,926 kg Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle, non-dairy — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Costa Rica or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 138,103 kg against 111,216 kg in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle, non-dairy — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Costa Rica and Rwanda?
26,887 kg, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Rwanda rank globally for cattle, non-dairy — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Costa Rica ranks 125th and Rwanda ranks 122nd of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Rwanda: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/costa-rica/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/costa-rica/rwanda/">Costa Rica vs Rwanda: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).