Ecuador vs Israel: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Ecuador
230,977 kg
in 2023
Israel
213,028 kg
in 2023
Ecuador rank
108th
Israel rank
110th

Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Ecuador
  • Israel
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 230,977 kg against 213,028 kg in Israel, a difference of 17,949 kg.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Israel's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 108th and Israel ranks 110th of 190 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Israel Difference Ahead
1960s 128,568 kg 68,525 kg 60,043 kg Ecuador
1970s 156,362 kg 82,255 kg 74,107 kg Ecuador
1980s 239,867 kg 96,847 kg 143,019 kg Ecuador
1990s 328,577 kg 115,080 kg 213,497 kg Ecuador
2000s 314,152 kg 120,085 kg 194,067 kg Ecuador
2010s 292,870 kg 167,938 kg 124,931 kg Ecuador
2020s 250,896 kg 202,317 kg 48,580 kg Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle, non-dairy — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Ecuador or Israel?
Ecuador, at 230,977 kg against 213,028 kg in Israel as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle, non-dairy — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Ecuador and Israel?
17,949 kg, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Israel?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Israel rank globally for cattle, non-dairy — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Ecuador ranks 108th and Israel ranks 110th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Israel: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/ecuador/israel/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-non-dairy-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/ecuador/israel/">Ecuador vs Israel: Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle, non-dairy — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).